The Importance of Third-Party Assignments for Structured Settlements

Third-party assignments play a crucial role in the structured settlement process, providing significant benefits to both the claimant and the defendant. Under Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 130, a qualified assignment allows the defendant to transfer the obligation to make periodic payments to a third-party assignee, typically an insurance company or a financial institution. This transfer provides financial security and tax advantages for all parties involved.

Analysis of Third-Party Assignments

Qualified Assignments: A qualified assignment is a legal mechanism that transfers the defendant's obligation to make periodic payments to a third-party assignee. This assignment must meet specific requirements under I.R.C. § 130 to qualify for tax benefits. The assignee assumes the responsibility for making the periodic payments, and the defendant is released from further liability.

Tax Benefits: One of the primary advantages of third-party assignments is the tax benefits they offer. Under I.R.C. § 130, the defendant can take an immediate tax deduction for the full amount of the settlement, including the future periodic payments. This deduction is not available if the defendant retains the obligation to make the payments. Additionally, the periodic payments made by the assignee to the claimant are tax-exempt under I.R.C. § 104(a)(2), providing significant tax savings for the claimant.

Financial Security: Third-party assignments provide financial security for the claimant by ensuring that the periodic payments will be made as agreed. The assignee, typically an insurance company, is responsible for funding the structured settlement through qualified funding assets, such as annuities or Treasury securities. This arrangement provides a steady and reliable source of income for the claimant, reducing the risk of default.

Case Examples

  1. Case Example 1: In a personal injury case, the defendant agrees to a structured settlement of $1,000,000 to be paid over 20 years. Instead of making the payments directly, the defendant assigns the obligation to an insurance company through a qualified assignment. The insurance company purchases an annuity to fund the settlement, and the claimant receives $50,000 per year tax-free. The defendant takes an immediate tax deduction for the full $1,000,000, and the claimant benefits from the financial security and tax savings provided by the structured settlement.

  2. Case Example 2: In a wrongful death case, the defendant agrees to a structured settlement of $500,000 to be paid over 10 years. The defendant assigns the obligation to a financial institution through a qualified assignment. The financial institution invests the settlement funds in Treasury securities and makes periodic payments to the claimant. The claimant receives $50,000 per year tax-free, and the defendant takes an immediate tax deduction for the full $500,000. This arrangement provides financial security for the claimant and tax benefits for the defendant.

Recommendations

  1. Engage Experienced Advisors: It is essential to work with experienced financial and legal advisors who are knowledgeable about structured settlements and third-party assignments. These professionals can help structure the settlement to maximize tax benefits and ensure long-term financial security for the claimant.

  2. Choose a Reputable Assignee: Select a reputable and financially stable assignee to fund the structured settlement. The assignee should have a strong track record of fulfilling its obligations and providing reliable financial security.

  3. Understand Tax Implications: Familiarize yourself with the tax implications of third-party assignments under I.R.C. § 130. Ensure that the settlement meets the requirements for tax-exempt status and that the defendant can take the appropriate tax deductions.

  4. Review Settlement Terms: Carefully review the terms of the structured settlement and the qualified assignment to ensure that they align with the claimant's financial needs and goals. Tailor the payment schedule and amounts to meet the claimant's long-term financial requirements.

  5. Monitor Compliance: Regularly monitor compliance with the requirements of I.R.C. § 130 to ensure that the structured settlement remains in good standing. This includes verifying that the assignee is fulfilling its obligations and that the settlement funds are being managed appropriately.

By following these recommendations, both the claimant and the defendant can benefit from the financial security and tax advantages provided by third-party assignments under I.R.C. § 130. This approach ensures that the claimant receives a steady stream of income while the defendant can take advantage of significant tax deductions.

Share