Six Big Personal Injury Lawsuits against Home Depot

Home Depot, the largest home improvement retailer in the United States, is a go-to destination for DIY enthusiasts, contractors, and homeowners. But behind its bright orange façade and aisles filled with tools and materials lies a history of legal battles—some of which have resulted in significant personal injury lawsuits. From slip-and-fall accidents to defective products, Home Depot has faced its fair share of litigation.

In this article, we'll explore six major personal injury lawsuits against Home Depot, examining the facts of each case, the legal arguments, and the outcomes. Whether you're a consumer, a legal professional, or simply curious about corporate liability, these cases offer valuable insights into the importance of safety, accountability, and justice.

1. The $25 Million Slip-and-Fall Case

The Incident:

In 2017, a Florida woman filed a lawsuit against Home Depot after she slipped and fell in one of its stores. The plaintiff alleged that she stepped on a loose screw while walking down an aisle, causing her to fall and sustain severe injuries, including a fractured hip and traumatic brain injury.

The Lawsuit:

The plaintiff claimed that Home Depot failed to maintain a safe environment for customers. Specifically, she argued that the store neglected to inspect the aisles regularly and failed to remove hazards like the loose screw.

The Outcome:

A jury awarded the plaintiff $25 million in damages, one of the largest slip-and-fall verdicts in Florida history. The case highlighted the importance of regular store maintenance and the potential consequences of neglecting customer safety.

2. The Defective Ladder Case

The Incident:

In 2014, a California man purchased a ladder from Home Depot to use for home repairs. While using the ladder, it collapsed, causing him to fall and suffer multiple fractures and spinal injuries.

The Lawsuit:

The plaintiff sued Home Depot and the ladder manufacturer, alleging that the ladder was defectively designed and that Home Depot failed to warn consumers about its dangers. He argued that the retailer had a duty to ensure the products it sold were safe for use.

The Outcome:

The case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. However, it underscored the responsibility retailers have to vet the safety of the products they sell and to provide adequate warnings to consumers.

3. The Falling Plywood Case

The Incident:

In 2016, a Texas man was shopping at a Home Depot when a stack of plywood fell on him, causing severe injuries, including a broken leg and internal injuries. The plaintiff claimed that the plywood was improperly stacked and secured.

The Lawsuit:

The lawsuit alleged that Home Depot failed to follow proper safety protocols for stacking and securing heavy materials. The plaintiff argued that the store's negligence directly caused his injuries.

The Outcome:

The case was settled for $2.5 million, emphasizing the importance of adhering to safety standards in retail environments, especially when handling heavy or hazardous materials.

4. The Forklift Accident Case

The Incident:

In 2018, a Home Depot employee in Georgia was injured when a forklift operated by another employee struck him. The injured worker suffered multiple fractures and required extensive medical treatment.

The Lawsuit:

The employee sued Home Depot, claiming that the company failed to provide adequate training and supervision for forklift operators. He also alleged that the store did not enforce safety protocols, leading to the accident.

The Outcome:

The case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. It highlighted the need for proper training and enforcement of safety measures in the workplace to prevent accidents and injuries.

5. The Toxic Fumes Case

The Incident:

In 2019, a group of Home Depot employees in California filed a lawsuit after being exposed to toxic fumes from a chemical spill in the store. The employees reported symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, and respiratory issues.

The Lawsuit:

The lawsuit alleged that Home Depot failed to properly store and handle hazardous materials, leading to the spill. The plaintiffs argued that the company did not provide adequate safety training or equipment to handle such incidents.

The Outcome:

The case was settled for $1.8 million, with the funds distributed among the affected employees. This case underscored the importance of proper handling and storage of hazardous materials and the need for comprehensive safety training.

6. The Escalator Malfunction Case

The Incident:

In 2020, a customer at a Home Depot in New York was injured when an escalator malfunctioned, causing her to fall and sustain serious injuries, including a broken arm and head trauma.

The Lawsuit:

The plaintiff sued Home Depot, alleging that the company failed to properly maintain and inspect the escalator. She argued that the store's negligence led to the malfunction and her subsequent injuries.

The Outcome:

The case was settled for $1.2 million, highlighting the importance of regular maintenance and inspection of store equipment to ensure customer safety.

Latest posts in our blog

Be the first to read what's new!

Chesterfield's rapid evolution from rural farmland to bustling suburban hub has created a transportation ecosystem unlike anywhere else in Missouri. The city's road network—a patchwork of historic country lanes, 1970s-era suburban arteries, and modern highway interchanges—creates unique accident patterns that baffle even experienced insurance...

Uber and Lyft accidents in St. Louis arise from a variety of factors, many of which are distinct from typical car accidents due to the involvement of a rideshare company. One of the primary causes is driver negligence, which may include distracted driving, speeding, or failure to adhere to traffic laws. Given that rideshare drivers are often under...

Dental malpractice in Missouri arises when a dental professional breaches the standard of care, resulting in harm to the patient. This breach can occur through negligence, incompetence, or intentional misconduct, and it must be proven that the practitioner's actions deviated from what a reasonably prudent dentist would have done under similar...

Missouri is not a traditional no-fault insurance state, meaning it operates under a tort-based system where the at-fault driver's insurance is responsible for covering damages. However, Missouri law does incorporate certain modified no-fault principles, particularly concerning Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage, which can complicate how...