Example of How Structured Settlements Save Money in Taxes vs. Regular Annuities

When it comes to receiving a large sum of money—whether from a personal injury settlement, lottery winnings, or an inheritance—how you receive that money can have a significant impact on your tax liability. Two common options are structured settlements and regular annuities. While both provide a steady stream of income, they are treated very differently by the IRS. Understanding these differences can save you thousands—or even millions—of dollars in taxes.

In this article, we'll break down the tax advantages of structured settlements compared to regular annuities, using real-world examples to illustrate how these financial tools work. Whether you're a plaintiff considering a settlement offer, a financial planner advising clients, or simply someone curious about tax-efficient strategies, this guide will provide the insights you need.

What Are Structured Settlements and Regular Annuities?

Before diving into the tax implications, let's define these two financial products:

Structured Settlements

A structured settlement is a financial arrangement typically used in personal injury cases. Instead of receiving a lump sum, the plaintiff agrees to receive periodic payments over time. These payments are often tailored to meet specific needs, such as covering medical expenses or replacing lost income.

Regular Annuities

A regular annuity is a financial product sold by insurance companies. In exchange for a lump-sum payment, the insurer agrees to provide regular payments to the annuitant (the person who owns the annuity) for a specified period or for life.

While both structured settlements and regular annuities provide periodic payments, their tax treatment is where they differ significantly.

The Tax Advantage of Structured Settlements

The primary tax advantage of structured settlements lies in their tax-exempt status. According to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 104(a)(2), compensation received for physical injuries or sickness is generally excluded from taxable income. This means that if you receive a structured settlement as part of a personal injury claim, the payments are 100% tax-free.

Example:

Imagine you're awarded a $1 million settlement in a car accident case. You have two options:

  1. Lump Sum: Receive the entire $1 million upfront.

  2. Structured Settlement: Receive $50,000 per year for 20 years.

If you choose the lump sum, you'll likely owe taxes on the interest earned if you invest the money. However, if you opt for the structured settlement, the entire $50,000 per year is tax-free because it's considered compensation for your injury.

The Tax Treatment of Regular Annuities

Regular annuities, on the other hand, are not tax-exempt. When you purchase an annuity, the IRS considers it an investment. As a result, the payments you receive are subject to taxation based on the exclusion ratio. This ratio determines what portion of each payment is considered a return of your principal (which is tax-free) and what portion is considered earnings (which is taxable).

Example:

Let's say you purchase a 1millionannuitythatpaysyou1millionannuitythatpaysyou50,000 per year for 20 years. The exclusion ratio might determine that 70% of each payment is a return of your principal (tax-free) and 30% is earnings (taxable). This means:

  • Tax-Free Portion: $35,000 per year.

  • Taxable Portion: $15,000 per year.

Depending on your tax bracket, you could owe thousands of dollars in taxes each year on the $15,000 taxable portion.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Structured Settlement vs. Regular Annuity

Let's compare the two options using the same $1 million example:

Aspect Structured Settlement Regular Annuity
Tax Status 100% tax-free (if for physical injury) Partially taxable (based on exclusion ratio)
Annual Payment $50,000 (tax-free) 50,000(50,000(35,000 tax-free, $15,000 taxable)
Total Tax Over 20 Years $0 15,000/yearx20years=15,000/yearx20years=300,000 (assuming a 20% tax rate)
Net Income Over 20 Years $1,000,000 1,000,000−1,000,000−300,000 = $700,000

As you can see, the structured settlement saves you $300,000 in taxes over 20 years compared to the regular annuity.

Additional Benefits of Structured Settlements

Beyond the tax advantages, structured settlements offer several other benefits:

  1. Customizable Payments: Payments can be tailored to meet your specific needs, such as covering medical expenses or replacing lost income.

  2. Financial Security: Structured settlements provide a steady stream of income, reducing the risk of overspending or poor investment decisions.

  3. Protection from Creditors: In many cases, structured settlement payments are protected from creditors and bankruptcy proceedings.

When a Regular Annuity Might Make Sense

While structured settlements offer significant tax advantages, there are situations where a regular annuity might be a better choice:

  1. Non-Injury-Related Income: If the income is not related to a physical injury (e.g., lottery winnings or inheritance), a structured settlement's tax benefits won't apply.

  2. Flexibility: Regular annuities often offer more flexibility in terms of payment schedules and investment options.

  3. Higher Returns: Depending on the annuity's terms, you might earn a higher return compared to a structured settlement.

Latest posts in our blog

Be the first to read what's new!

Highway hypnosis, also known as "white line fever," is a trance-like mental state in which a driver operates a vehicle for extended periods without conscious awareness of their actions. This phenomenon occurs when the brain enters a state of automaticity, where repetitive stimuli—such as the monotonous hum of the engine, the rhythmic passing of...

Chesterfield, Missouri, is a bustling suburban city with a mix of residential neighborhoods, commercial districts, and major highways, making it a hotspot for various types of car accidents. Due to its unique traffic patterns, road designs, and high population density in certain areas, certain accident types occur more frequently than others....

Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) refers to a condition where a fetus fails to achieve its expected growth potential due to pathological factors, resulting in a birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Unlike small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, who may be constitutionally small but otherwise healthy, IUGR implies an...

The distinction between a simple bruise and thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) lies at the intersection of trauma mechanics, vascular physiology, and neurological pathology. A bruise, or contusion, represents localized damage to subcutaneous tissues and capillaries caused by blunt force trauma, resulting in visible discoloration and tenderness that...